Dossier · Claimed-regulator entity
Financial Commission.
Also known as: Financial Commission · The Financial Commission · FinaCom · financialcommission.org
Beacon Score
5
Never authorised
Regulator Record 5
Editorial Practices: not yet rated
The Financial Commission (financialcommission.org) is a private dispute-resolution and complaint-handling organisation. Brokers can pay membership fees in exchange for the right to display the Financial Commission seal on their websites. The organisation is not a financial regulator, holds no public-law authority over its members, and does not supervise, license, or examine member firms in the way a regulator does. Its primary public service is acting as a private arbitration forum for client complaints against member brokers.
Editorial caveat: Not a financial regulator. Membership in the Financial Commission is a paid subscription, not a regulatory authorisation. Brokers without real regulator licences sometimes display Financial Commission membership as a substitute credibility prop; this should not be relied upon as evidence of regulatory oversight. A broker that holds genuine Tier 1 or Tier 2 authorisations may also be a member, in which case the Financial Commission membership is incidental.
Profile
- Headquarters
- Unknown
- Parent company
- Unknown
- Website
- Unknown
- Pillar III
- Not yet researched
Items on file
0
Warnings
0
Enforcement
0
Range
—
Anything wrong here, or missing context an editor should consider? Right of reply and corrections both run through info@enon.md. Editorial standards: editorial policy · disclaimer.
How to read the rating
Rating legend
Every entity dossier carries a Beacon Score (0–100, higher is cleaner) plus a band that summarises the score in plain language. The Beacon Score combines the arithmetic Regulator Record (severity × recency-decay of public regulator actions, weighted by regulator tier) with a manual editorial overlay of up to ±10 points where observed practice differs from the public-record arithmetic. Both the arithmetic and any editorial adjustment are shown with their reasons on every dossier.
Three special bands sit alongside the numeric scale to capture situations the maths alone misses:
- SevereMajor enforcement against a still-active firm, or a long-running pattern of unauthorised activity. Read the timeline before engaging.
- Never authorisedOperating or operated without verifiable authorisation in any jurisdiction we have records for.
- Licence revokedAuthorisation revoked or withdrawn. May still be visible on the internet under the original brand.
- High concernSignificant enforcement footprint — multiple actions, recent in time, or substantial in size.
- Authorised, with restrictionsHolds a current authorisation that the regulator has formally restricted — e.g. an undertaking not to solicit retail clients in a specific region.
- Mixed recordMultiple regulator findings of varying severity. Current standing requires reader judgement; check the timeline.
- Material findingsOne or more material regulator findings on record, but the firm remains authorised and the matters appear historical.
- Clean recordNo material public regulator actions on file. Apparently in good standing.
Each entity is named in items linked to its dossier. Disagree with a score? Right of reply is available on every dossier page.